Your book is about the MonCoin project
It actually came out of my dissertation work in the late 2000s. At the end of that study about using social media with young people as a learning tool, it got me thinking that smartphones would become a pretty significant device on the cultural landscape.
There is a body of literature and educational research that claims if young people are connected to their civic environment, they become more interested in their educational environment and education at large. With the MonCoin project, we worked with 16 to 18 year-old students who dropped out or were at risk of dropping out.
Our hypothesis was, “Give these kids mobile devices, deliver the curriculum through their mobile devices, and they don’t have to come to school.”
But while they didn’t want to be in school and had a very antagonistic relationship with school, we were still able to reach them.
What we found was they began showing up at school. They became interested in connecting with each other around the project.
Mobile devices aren’t just about taking pictures and posting them. They are a tool for young people to understand their agency in the world and their relationships with people and places around them. That kind of learning gives them a sense of agency that they lacked in school. We found that when we empower young people to take control of their learning, they become more engaged.
Were parents concerned that the quality of their children’s education would decline with remote learning on mobile devices?
We did not receive much pushback. Parents were interested. There were some 300 participants but only two or three opted out. I think most parents saw this as an opportunity to develop a tool for something good.
How does mobile media in an art education classroom translate to a regular classroom?