The first challenge in studying happiness is that it means different things to different people. In fact, it’s such a slippery word that positive psychologists tend to use other, more precise terms instead.
One of these concepts, subjective well-being (SWB), has three main components: high levels of pleasant emotions, low levels of negative emotions and overall satisfaction with life. Researchers use questionnaires to measure it.
“SWB is a bit meatier than happiness, partly because it leaves a place for negative emotions,” says Julie Hanck, BSc 04, who teaches in the psychology department at John Abbott College in the Montreal suburb of Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue. After receiving her bachelor’s from Concordia, Hanck earned a PhD in neuroscience from McGill University.
Another way of breaking down happiness into components is known as the PERMA model, developed by the positive-psychology pioneer Martin Seligman. Its name is an acronym that stands for Positive emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning and Accomplishment.
Like SWB, PERMA extends beyond pure pleasure-seeking. Staying up all night to comfort a crying baby may not necessarily evoke immediate positive emotions, for example, but it can hold profound significance and meaning for a parent. Both Hanck and Leithman find PERMA to be a useful framework.
“When I walk into a classroom, I’ll say, ‘Okay, write down 10 things that make you happy,’” Leithman says. “And then we’ll see if people have listed something that speaks to each of the five categories. If not, that’s fine: That’s where you are. Maybe the exercise could help you think about which aspects of happiness you’re not currently tending to.”
No matter how we define happiness, it’s not entirely within our control, emphasizes Hanck.
Genetics play a role, as does our environment, including social systems. Some people, as a result, face a lot more stress and hardship than others.
“I don’t want to tell vulnerable people that they’re solely responsible for their own unhappiness,” says Hanck. “And I don’t want to oversell the interventions I teach, either, because they’re not always life-changing. I just want to empower people to better understand themselves and provide them with the direction they can take to grow.”